Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac

Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac

Marsoni

M251S

$175.25

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + MakpacLieferumfang: 1x Makita DBO 482 Akku Schwingschleifer 1x Staubbox 2x Makita BL 1850 B 18 V 5,0 Ah Akku 1x Makita DC 18 RC Ladegert 1x Makita Makpac Koffer 1x Universaleinlage Produktbeschreibung: Der Makita DBO 482 Z Akku Schwingschleifer ist ein starker Schwingschleifer mit effizienter Staubabsaugung. Das super Handling, sowie die handfreundliche Bauform zeichnen das Gert aus. Darber hinaus betrgt der Schwingungsbereich 1,5 mm und die

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Makita DBO 482 RTJ Akku Schwingschleifer 18 V 112 x 102 mm + 2x Akku 5,0 Ah + Ladegerät + Makpac in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

Pros:boots were extremely light and comfortable. Cons: if you work in rocky areas like northern California you will only get 1/2-1 season on these. Mine lasted 6 months then the fabric ripped, the soles had holes all the way through to the middle, and the tread wore down til they were smooth slick rubber. If they cost $150-$175 I'd buy 2 pairs a season but at over $300 a pair there are much better options

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 11, 2021

marlene

Draper, US

★★★★★ 1

True advertisement

Size: 11, Color: Black

I just purchased these boots 09/03/25 , let's see what these reviews are about? Why isn't their a direct website for the company? Quality and Durability.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 5, 2025

Verified Purchase

c.jahelka

New York, US

★★★★★ 4

Nice boot!!

Size: 8.5, Color: Black

Very comfortable. Built well and obviously high quality. Fits a little big, about a size larger. They are a little thinner/cooler than the Danner Wildland and Haix Missoula. They do not have any NFPA rated tags or labels on the boot. Will upgrade the laces. Would love to see the boa system on this boot!

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2020

Verified Purchase

Amazon Customer

San Leandro, US

★★★★★ 2

Needs work

Size: 12, Color: Black

I’m disappointed that I spent almost 400$ on a pair of boots and wore them for 3 days and both boot laces broke near the eyelets. As a wildland firefighter I need to be able to rely on my boots.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2020

Verified Purchase

Average G

Charlottesville, US

★★★★★ 5

Like all Asics I've owned - Good

Size: 12 X-Wide, Color: Steel Grey/Cloud Grey

I've worn Asics for about 35 years now. Every pair I've had, and there have been many, have fit well and gotten the job done. The Gel-Venture 11 are performing as expected which is very well. The cushioning and support in the heel and arch are excellent. Very comfortable to walk and run in these shoes. Finally, and less importantly, the looks are just OK. The cheap "iron on" Asics logo doesn't look good. I've been purchasing Asics for as long as I have strictly for the performance quality anyway.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026